Assessment of Energy and Environmental Impacts of Transition from Road to Rail Passenger Transportation: A Case Study of Tanzania's SGR Electric Train
Abstract
The study assesses the energy and environmental impacts of transitioning from road to rail passenger transportation in Tanzania, with a focus on the Dar es Salaam–Dodoma corridor, which is served by the newly implemented Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) electric train. Tanzania's heavy reliance on diesel-powered road transport contributes to high fuel consumption and significant greenhouse gas emissions. This research evaluates the SGR as a sustainable alternative, powered primarily by hydropower. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study collected and analysed data from the Tanzania Railway Corporation, transport authorities, and utility providers to compare energy consumption and emissions between the SGR electric trains and conventional diesel buses operating on the same route. Findings reveal that the SGR transports 4,231 passengers daily across five train services, equivalent to 89 conventional buses. Electric trains consume approximately 9,065.21 kWh daily, while buses require 160,378.00 kWh to transport the same passenger volume, representing a daily energy saving equivalent to 14,275 diesel litres. Environmentally, SGR operations generate only 2.982 tCO₂e per day, compared to 40.548 tCO₂e from buses, resulting in a substantial daily reduction of 37.566 tCO₂e in emissions. The analysis demonstrates that electric rail transport consumes 4.15–4.74 kWh per kilometre and 1.92–2.85 kWh per passenger, which is significantly lower than buses, at 54.06–94.61 kWh/km and 36.99–38.27 kWh/passenger. Similarly, emissions per passenger-kilometre are markedly lower for rail transport across all metrics. These results confirm that transitioning from road to electric rail passenger transport offers substantial energy efficiency gains and environmental benefits, supporting Tanzania's sustainable development objectives and climate commitments. The study provides empirical evidence for policymakers to prioritise rail infrastructure expansion, reducing the transport sector's carbon footprint while meeting growing mobility demands in an economically and environmentally sustainable manner.
Downloads
References
International Energy Agency. (2021). Tracking transport 2021. https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-transport-2021
International Council on Clean Transportation. (2022). Global transportation sector emissions. https://theicct.org
National Environmental Management Council. (2022). Annual report on urban air quality in Tanzania.
Surface and Marine Transport Regulatory Authority. (2023). Annual Transport Sector Performance Report.
United Nations Environment Programme. (2020). Electric mobility: Taking stock of electric vehicle deployment. https://www.unep.org
United Republic of Tanzania. (1999). Tanzania Development Vision 2025. President's Office, Planning Commission.
United Republic of Tanzania. (2011). National Transport Policy. Ministry of Works and Transport.
United Republic of Tanzania. (2015). National Energy Policy. Ministry of Energy and Minerals.
United Republic of Tanzania. (2021). Updated Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). Vice President's Office, Division of Environment.
Chaturvedi, V., & Kim, S. H. (2015). Long-term energy and emission implications of a global shift to an electricity-based public rail transportation system. Energy Policy, 81, 176-185.
Chester, M., & Horvath, A. (2009). An environmental assessment of passenger transportation should encompass both infrastructure and supply chains. Environmental Research Letters, 4(2), 024008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/2/024008
Brown, M. A., Li, Y., & Southworth, F. (2020). Reducing transportation emissions: A review of U.S. policies. Energy Policy, 144, 111687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111687
European Environment Agency (EEA). (2021). Rail and waterborne — best for low-carbon motorised transport. European Environment Agency Briefing. https://www.eea.europa.eu
Wolfram, P., & Wiedmann, T. (2017). Electrifying railways in the European Union: A multi-regional input–output analysis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 57, 96– 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.08.023
Liu, Y., Wu, J., & Ma, X. (2019). Environmental impact of high-speed rail: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.313
Gota, S., Huizenga, C., Peet, K., Medimorec, N., & Bakker, S. (2018). Decarbonising transport to achieve Paris Agreement targets. Energy Efficiency, 12, 363–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9671-3
de la Torre, L., & Jaller, M. (2021). Urban transport electrification in Latin America: The case of Mexico City's metro. Transport Policy, 100, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.10.004
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). (2020). Sustainable Urban Transport in Latin America. https://www.iadb.org
TRC. (2019). Standard Gauge Railway Line (SGR) Project Dar es Salaam – Makutopora, Tanzania: Environmental and Social Management and Monitoring Plan. https://www.trc.co.tz/uploads/publications/sw1572527656-ESMMP%20SGR%20latest.pdf
Copyright (c) 2025 Florence Edward, Mashauri Adam Kusekwa, Oscar Zongo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.