Strategic Philosophy and Competitive Advantage: Conceptual Understanding and Application in Public Sector Organisations
All organizations deal with strategy, but organizations operate under different conditions, affecting their understanding of how to do strategy. The study aims at providing an argument on how managers in public sector institutions apply the practice of strategic philosophy in their quest for effective practice of strategic management. Strategy is vital for a competitiveness, effective and efficient public service delivery and for successful leadership. Strategic philosophy refers to a set of beliefs, personal views or rules concerning the nature of organizational strategy. Managers apply these beliefs, values and rules to help make strategic decisions that provide direction, cohesion, mission and motivation to pursue organization’s strategic goals. The bureaucratic nature of public sector causes it to function according to unique set of principles, norms and rules. These rules and principles are influenced by the political nature of the institutions with little autonomy and /or discretion to decide on priorities, set own goals and deal with challenges and problems in order to exploit any emerging opportunities. This article used systematic literature review to identify studies that discussed the concepts of strategic philosophy and competitive advantage. Two focus groups discussions were also held with managers from public sector and civil society organizations. Since previous studies have been treating these concepts separately, articles dealing with each aspect of the study were reviewed and analysed to establish if any relationship exists between the two concepts. The study found out that the position occupied by a manager in the organization, skills and experience determine how he/she conceptualises the whole process of strategic planning. Senior managers believe that their role involves crafting the mission, vision, values, strategic goals and providing direction of the enterprise. They also determine the strategies that are likely to create superior performance.
Brockmann, E. N., & Anthony, W. P. (2002). Tacit knowledge and strategic decision making. Group & Organization Management, 27(4), 436-455.Coyne, K. P., & Subramaniam, S. (1996). Bringing discipline to strategy. The McKinsey Quarterly, (4), 14.
Currie, G. (1999). The influence of middle managers in the business planning process: a case study in the UK NHS. British Journal of Management, 10(2), 141-155.
Du Gay, P. (1991). Enterprise culture and the ideology of excellence. New formations, 13(1), 45-61.
Fenton‐O'Creevy, M. (2001). Employee involvement and the middle manager: saboteur or scapegoat?. Human Resource Management Journal, 11(1), 24-40.
Fink, A. (2019). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper. Sage publications.
Flint, G. D. (2000). What is the meaning of competitive advantage?. Journal of Competitiveness Studies, 8(1), 121-129.
Ford, C. M., & Gioia, D. A. (2000). Factors influencing creativity in the domain of managerial decision making. Journal of management, 26(4), 705-732.
Fredriksson, M., & Pallas, J. (2016). Characteristics of public sectors and their consequences for strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10(3), 149-152.
Grewal, R., & Tansuhaj, P. (2001). Building organizational capabilities for managing economic crisis: The role of market orientation and strategic flexibility. Journal of marketing, 65(2), 67-80.
Groysberg, B., Lee, J., Price, J., & Cheng, J. (2018). The leader’s guide to corporate culture. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 44-52.
Guth, W. D., & MacMillan, I. C. (1986). Strategy implementation versus middle management self‐interest. Strategic Management Journal, 7(4), 313-327.
Keat, R. & Abercombie, N. (1991) Enterprise Culture, Routledge, London.
Klein, J. (2002). Beyond competitive advantage. Strategic Change, 11(6), 317-327.
Lipsky. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of individuals in public services. New York: Sage Foundation.
Lipsky. (2010). Street Level Bureaucracy Dilemmas of Individuals in Public Service. New York: Russell Publisher.
Markoczy, L. (2001). Consensus formation during strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 22(11), 1013-1031.
Mintzberg, H. (1987). Crafting strategy (pp. 66-75). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. A. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic management journal, 6(3), 257-272.
Needle, D. (2004). Business in Context: An Introduction to Business and Its Environment, Fourth Edition. Thomson Learning, U.K.
Nichol, R. L. (1992). Get middle managers involved in the planning process. The Journal of business strategy, 13(3), 26-32.
O’Shaughnessy, N. J. (1996). Michael Porter’s competitive advantage revisited. Management Decision.
Parnell, J. A. (1997). New evidence in the generic strategy and business performance debate: A research note. British Journal of Management, 8(2), 175-181.
Parnell, J. A. (2005). Strategic philosophy and management level. Management decision.
Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource‐based view. Strategic management journal, 14(3), 179-191.
Porter, M. E. (1979). Forces affecting competitive intensity. How competitive forces shape strategy Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.
Porter, M.E., (1980), Competitive Strategy, Free Press, New York
Porter, M.E., (1985), Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York
Powell, T. C. (2001). Competitive advantage: logical and philosophical considerations. Strategic management journal, 22(9), 875-888.
Salaman, G., & Du Gay, P. (1992). The Cult(ure) of the Customer. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 615-633.
Schein, E. H. (1984). Coming to a New Awareness of Organizational Culture. MIT Sloan Management Review, January 15, 1984.
The Business Dictionary. Organizational Culture
Whittington, R. 1993, What is Strategy and Does It Matter? Routledge, London.
Copyright (c) 2020 David Minja, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.