Systematic Review of Monitoring and Evaluation Best Practices for Climate Change Adaptation Programmes: Lessons for Kenya

  • Abdiqafar Mohamed Daystar University
  • Evans Taabu Okumu University of Nairobi
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##: https://doi.org/10.37284/ajccrs.4.1.2764
##share.article##:

Résumé

Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems are critical for assessing the effectiveness of climate change adaptation programmes, yet gaps persist, particularly in resource-constrained regions like Kenya. This study systematically reviews global and Kenyan frameworks to identify opportunities and address gaps in M&E practices, focusing on their role in enhancing adaptation outcomes. The findings reveal that participatory approaches, robust indicators, and technology-driven tools significantly improve adaptation effectiveness, with participatory methods increasing resilience outcomes by 40% in urban settings. However, challenges such as inadequate localisation of frameworks, limited institutional capacity, and an overreliance on checklist-based methods undermine their potential. This article underscores the need for context-specific, inclusive, and learning-oriented M&E systems to address Kenya’s unique climate challenges. By aligning global best practices with local realities, the study provides actionable insights for developing robust M&E systems to support sustainable and scalable climate adaptation efforts

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

Références

Barcena, A., & Bahadur, A. (2024). Co-producing urban resilience solutions: The role of power and politics. Revista Brasileira de Avaliação, 13(2 spe), e130424. https://doi.org/10.4322/rbaval202412004

Bours, D., McGinn, C., & Pringle, P. (2013). Monitoring & evaluation for climate change adaptation: A synthesis of tools, frameworks, and approaches. SEA Change CoP; UKCIP. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2331.1124

Bours, D., McGinn, C., & Pringle, P. (2014). Monitoring & evaluation for climate change adaptation and resilience: A synthesis of tools, frameworks, and approaches (2nd ed.). SEA Change CoP; UKCIP. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1151.4645

Bours, D., McGinn, C., & Pringle, P. (2015). Editors' notes. New Directions for Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20127

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brown, C., Shaker, R. R., & Das, R. (2018). A review of approaches for and evaluation of urban climate resilience initiatives. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9891-7

Carreiro, G. (2024). How to improve M&E in climate adaptation action in the case of international projects dealing with socio-hydrological resilience. In M. Granceri Bradaschia, F. Magni, & F. Musco (Eds.), Climate change adaptation, flood risk, and beyond: Planning for climate-proof cities. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65463-3_11

Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. Intermediate Technology Publications.

Christiansen, L., Schaer, C., Larsen, C., & Naswa, P. (n.d.). Monitoring & evaluation for climate change adaptation: A summary of key challenges and emerging practice. Technical University of Denmark. Retrieved from https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/157400902/MandE_challenge_guidance_note_01_07_16.pdf

Dinshaw, A., Fisher, S., McGray, H., Rai, N., & Schaar, J. (n.d.). Monitoring and evaluation of climate change adaptation: Methodological approaches. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jxrclr0ntjd-en

Dupuits, E., Garcés, A., Llambí, L. D., et al. (2024). Strategies for monitoring and evaluation of climate change adaptation: Localizing global approaches into Andean realities. NPJ Climate Action, 3(19), e44168. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-023-00097-8

Estrella, M., & Gaventa, J. (2000). Who counts reality? Participatory monitoring and evaluation: A literature review. International Institute for Environment and Development.

Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF

Feldmeyer, D., Wilden, D., Kind, C., Kaiser, T., Goldschmidt, R., Diller, C., & Birkmann, J. (2019). Indicators for monitoring urban climate change resilience and adaptation. Sustainability, 11(10), 2931. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102931

GIZ. (2017). Results-based monitoring for climate change adaptation. Retrieved from GIZ website. https://www.giz.de/expertise/html/59828.html

Goonesekera, S. M., & Olazabal, M. (2022). Climate adaptation indicators and metrics: State of local policy practice. Ecological Indicators, 145, 109657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109657

Hammill, A., Leclerc, L., & Olivier, J. (2013). Lessons learned from M&E of climate change adaptation initiatives. International Institute for Sustainable Development.

Jaiswal, A., Sagar, R., Pandey, A., Yadav, D., Ansari, M. S., & Rawat, R. (2024). Building resilient urban futures: Adapting cities to climate change challenges. In S. Ghosh, S. Majumdar, & A. Cheshmehzangi (Eds.), Cities of tomorrow: Urban resilience and climate change preparedness. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9658-8_3

Jukemura, F. (2024). Climate adaptation monitoring frameworks: Challenges, best practices, needs. Revista Brasileira de Avaliação, 13(2 spe), e130424. Retrieved from https://app.periodikos.com.br/article/10.4322/rbaval202412004/pdf/rbaval-13-2+spe-e130424.pdf

Jukemura, F. (2024). Climate adaptation monitoring frameworks: Challenges, best practices, needs. Revista Brasileira de Avaliação, 13(2 spe), e130424. https://doi.org/10.4322/rbaval202412004

Khatibi, H., Wilkinson, S., Sweya, L. N., Baghersad, M., & Dianat, H. (2024). Navigating climate change challenges through smart resilient cities: A comprehensive assessment framework. Land, 13(3), 266. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13030266

Laccourreye, O., & Maisonneuve, H. (2019). French scientific medical journals confronted by developments in medical writing and the transformation of the medical press. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases, 136(5), 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2019.09.002

Leiter, T. (2015). Evaluating adaptation to climate change: Methodological challenges and approaches. New Directions for Evaluation, 147(1), 39- 52. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20127

Mehryar, S., Sasson, I., & Surminski, S. (2022). Supporting urban adaptation to climate change: What role can resilience measurement tools play? Urban Climate, 41, 101047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101047

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Moloney, S., Gooder, H., McListon, H., MacDonald, F., & Dunn, K. (2022). Beyond a ‘tick-box approach’ for local government climate change adaptation: Learning through doing with monitoring and evaluation. In Community quality-of-life indicators: Best cases IX (pp. 47–71). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06940-6_4

Mombauer, D., & Wijenayake, V. (2024). Policy gaps and needs analysis for the implementation of NDCs on adaptation and loss and damage in Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka. In V. Wijenayake, L. A. Stevenson, A. Takemoto, A. Ranjan, D. Mombauer, & N. Ismail (Eds.), Linking climate change adaptation, disaster risk reduction, and loss & damage. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8055-0_12

NDC Partnership. (2019). Kenya’s efforts to integrate climate adaptation into national systems. Retrieved from https://ndcpartnership.org.

Neufeldt, H., Christiansen, L., & Dale, T. W. (2021). Adaptation gap report 2020. Retrieved from https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/238807594/AGR2020.pdf

Njuguna, L., Uri, I., & Beauchamp, E. (2024). National monitoring, evaluation, and learning systems for climate change adaptation. Retrieved from https://www.evalforward.org/sites/default/files/2024-11/monitoring-evaluation-learning-systems-adaptation.pdf

Nowak, A. C., Njuguna, L., Ramirez-Villegas, J., et al. (2024). Opportunities to strengthen Africa’s efforts to track national-level climate adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 14(876–882). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02054-7

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1– 13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Oakes, L. E., Peterson St-Laurent, G., Cross, M. S., Washington, T., Tully, E., & Hagerman, S. (2022). Strengthening monitoring and evaluation of multiple benefits in conservation initiatives that aim to foster climate change adaptation. Conservation Science and Practice, 4(6), e12688. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12688

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Prana, A. M., Curl, A., Dionisio, M. R., Gomez, C., Hart, D., Apriyanto, H., & Prasetya, H. (2024). Urban planning approaches to support community-based flood adaptation in North Jakarta Kampungs. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 33(4), 383–405. https://doi.org/10.1108/dpm-05-2023-0114

Shammugam, S., Reckien, D., Grafakos, S., et al. (2024). Identifying good practice in national adaptation plans: A global review. Retrieved from https://cgspace.cgiar.org/items/3a1ac962-d2bf-45a9-85cb-84912a669c94

Silva Villanueva, P. (2011). Learning to ADAPT: Monitoring and evaluation approaches in climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction – Challenges, gaps and ways forward. Strengthening Climate Resilience Discussion Paper No. 9, Brighton: IDS. Retrieved from https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/articles/report/Learning_to_ADAPT_monitoring_and_evaluation_approaches_in_climate_change_adaptation_and_disaster_risk_reduction_challenges_gaps_and_ways_forward/26449384?file=48097957

Simonet, G., Agrawal, A., & Barrow, E. (2017). Measuring the effectiveness of climate change adaptation at local levels in Africa. Environment and Development, 22(3), 37-56.

Smith, B., Rai, N., D’Errico, S., Argon, I., & Brooks, N. (n.d.). Adaptation briefings: Monitoring and evaluation of adaptation – An introduction. Retrieved from https://www.adaptationcommunity.net/wp- content/uploads/2020/05/Adaptation-Briefings-2-Monitoring-and-Evaluation-of-Adaptation-An-Introduction.pdf

Spearman, M., & McGray, H. (2011). Making adaptation count: Concepts and options for monitoring and evaluation of climate change adaptation. GIZ & WRI.

UNDP. (2010). The adaptation learning mechanism: A global knowledge-sharing platform. Retrieved from https://www.uncclearn.org/wp-content/uploads/library/ceb04.pdf

UNEP. (2022). Adaptation gap report: Assessing progress in adaptation. Retrieved from https://www.unep.org/resources/adaptation-gap-report

UNFCCC. (2022). Adaptation Committee annual report: Adaptation metrics and methodologies. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/sb2023_05_adv.pdf

USAID ATLAS. (2019). Monitoring and evaluating climate adaptation activities: A reference guide for city managers. Retrieved from https://www.climatelinks.org/sites/default/files/asset/document/190812_USAID_ATLAS_Monitoring-and-Evaluating-CCA-activities-reference-guide_0.pdf

Publiée
13 mars, 2025